Abstract:

Understanding the effects of live feed and glucose on metabolic health, growth, and well-being is vital to nutritional behavior research. 100 zebra fish were randomly divided into two groups of 50. Group 1 received live feed (artemia, rotifers and paramecium), while Group 2 received Glucose as commercial food. The glucose group had lower weight and length than the live feed group. Live feed fed more, fed more often, and responded faster to food stimuli. Metabolic research showed that the glucose group used energy less efficiently due to greater glucose and fat levels. Statistical analysis, including paired t-tests, confirmed the considerable growth and metabolic activity differences between groups. Live feed appears to offer zebra fish a more balanced and healthy nutritional profile than glucose supplementation, encouraging better growth and natural eating.

Description:

.